Re: Death of TI' short run at the top of th ecalculator world

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Death of TI' short run at the top of th ecalculator world
From: "Daniel J. Curtin" <curtin@NKU.EDU>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 09:21:58 -0400
Organization: OneNet Communications News Hub
References: <7e02si$j0k$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu> <370BA35D.2F4EC9BF@baladyne.com>
Reply-To: curtin@spamnku.edu
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:28682

Adam,

    Be sure to note the date of the original post! You're absolutely correct
about the absurdity of the power claims.

Dan


Adam Davis wrote:

> I'd like to see anyone run a 50MHz processor *or* a 320x240x8 LCD
> display for any significant amount of time off 3 AAA batteries,
> nevermind both!
>
> -Adam
>

******************************************************************
* To UNSUBSCRIBE, send an email TO: listserv@lists.ppp.ti.com
* with a message (not the subject) that reads SIGNOFF CALC-TI
*
* Archives at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/calc-ti.html
******************************************************************

Follow-Ups:

Re: Death of TI' short run at the top of th ecalculator world

From: My name <x@X.X>

References:

From:

Re: Death of TI' short run at the top of th ecalculator world

From: Adam Davis <adavis@BALADYNE.COM>

Prev: Re: Programming is Assembly forTI-89/92+
Next: Ti-basic to PC Compiler? Is it Possible?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread