Re: Death of TI' short run at the top of th ecalculator world
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Death of TI' short run at the top of th ecalculator world
Is that possibly why the TI-89 seems to go through batteries a little faster
than my 83? It is 4 MHz faster?
Daniel J. Curtin <curtin@nku.edu> wrote in message
370CAD73.9C068277@nku.edu">news:370CAD73.9C068277@nku.edu...
> Adam,
>
> Be sure to note the date of the original post! You're absolutely
correct
> about the absurdity of the power claims.
>
> Dan
>
>
> Adam Davis wrote:
>
> > I'd like to see anyone run a 50MHz processor *or* a 320x240x8 LCD
> > display for any significant amount of time off 3 AAA batteries,
> > nevermind both!
> >
> > -Adam
> >
>
******************************************************************
* To UNSUBSCRIBE, send an email TO: listserv@lists.ppp.ti.com
* with a message (not the subject) that reads SIGNOFF CALC-TI
*
* Archives at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/calc-ti.html
******************************************************************
Follow-Ups:
References: