Re: TI-85 history

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: TI-85 history
From: "S.Todd" <ar800k0@ESPAM.NET>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 19:14:28 -0600
Organization: EarthLink Network, Inc.
References: <71vmuv$79o$1@autumn.news.rcn.net> <19981106162226.19056.00000226@ng66.aol.com> <71vqoo$hdp$1@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <364380C7.ACB9E7B7@nospam.visi.com> <36438e25.11992829@news.northcoast.com>
Reply-To: "S.Todd" <ar800k0@ESPAM.NET>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:26303

Duh!!!!

Tom wrote in message <36438e25.11992829@news.northcoast.com>...
>Perhaps it would help you to read Todd.  He said all but one reason
>was cosmetic, and you said no it's because he like's the speed of the
>85.  Both of you are talking about the same thing.
>
>
>On Fri, 06 Nov 1998 17:05:43 -0600, ToddEStan
><toddestn@nospam.visi.com> wrote:
>
>>S.Todd wrote:
>>>
>>> so what your saying is that all but one of your reasons are cosmetic and
the
>>> only functional reason is offset by the enormous amount of functions
that
>>> the ti86 has over the ti-85.
>>
>>No, he also said he likes the speed of the 85, and from what he does
>>with it (from other postings), he has stated that is can 2x-3x fasters
>>than the 86.
>>
>>Also add in price as advantage to the 85, even if it is only $20-$30
>>dollars you save over an 86.
>>
>>Todd
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: TI-85 history

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

References:

TI-85 history

From: Charlie Savel <Donnie.S@EROLS.COM>

Re: TI-85 history

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

Re: TI-85 history

From: "S.Todd" <ar800k0@ESPAM.NET>

Re: TI-85 history

From: ToddEStan <toddestn@NOSPAM.VISI.COM>

Re: TI-85 history

From: Tom <tomgREMOVE@NORTHCOAST.COM>

Prev: Re: Program List in 89
Next: Re: TI-85 history
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread