Re: TI-85 history

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: TI-85 history
From: Tom <tomgREMOVE@NORTHCOAST.COM>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1998 00:05:25 GMT
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com - Discussions start here!
References: <71vmuv$79o$1@autumn.news.rcn.net> <19981106162226.19056.00000226@ng66.aol.com> <71vqoo$hdp$1@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <364380C7.ACB9E7B7@nospam.visi.com>
Reply-To: Tom <tomgREMOVE@NORTHCOAST.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:26301

Perhaps it would help you to read Todd.  He said all but one reason
was cosmetic, and you said no it's because he like's the speed of the
85.  Both of you are talking about the same thing.


On Fri, 06 Nov 1998 17:05:43 -0600, ToddEStan
<toddestn@nospam.visi.com> wrote:

>S.Todd wrote:
>>
>> so what your saying is that all but one of your reasons are cosmetic and the
>> only functional reason is offset by the enormous amount of functions that
>> the ti86 has over the ti-85.
>
>No, he also said he likes the speed of the 85, and from what he does
>with it (from other postings), he has stated that is can 2x-3x fasters
>than the 86.
>
>Also add in price as advantage to the 85, even if it is only $20-$30
>dollars you save over an 86.
>
>Todd

Follow-Ups:

Re: TI-85 history

From: "S.Todd" <ar800k0@ESPAM.NET>

References:

TI-85 history

From: Charlie Savel <Donnie.S@EROLS.COM>

Re: TI-85 history

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

Re: TI-85 history

From: "S.Todd" <ar800k0@ESPAM.NET>

Re: TI-85 history

From: ToddEStan <toddestn@NOSPAM.VISI.COM>