Re: TI-85 history

Re: TI-85 history

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: TI-85 history
• From: ToddEStan <toddestn@NOSPAM.VISI.COM>
• Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 17:05:43 -0600
• Organization: SCI
• References: <71vmuv$79o$1@autumn.news.rcn.net> <19981106162226.19056.00000226@ng66.aol.com> <71vqoo$hdp$1@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
• Reply-To: ToddEStan <toddestn@NOSPAM.VISI.COM>
• Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:26300

S.Todd wrote:
>
> so what your saying is that all but one of your reasons are cosmetic and the
> only functional reason is offset by the enormous amount of functions that
> the ti86 has over the ti-85.

No, he also said he likes the speed of the 85, and from what he does
with it (from other postings), he has stated that is can 2x-3x fasters
than the 86.

Also add in price as advantage to the 85, even if it is only $20-$30
dollars you save over an 86.

Todd

--

Spam filters in place.  If you are accidently blocked, remove nospam.

• Re: TI-85 history
• From: Tom <tomgREMOVE@NORTHCOAST.COM>

• TI-85 history
• From: Charlie Savel <Donnie.S@EROLS.COM>
• Re: TI-85 history
• From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>
• Re: TI-85 history
• From: "S.Todd" <ar800k0@ESPAM.NET>

• Prev: Re: TI-85 history
• Next: Re: TI-85 history
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread