Re: Why not the TI-92?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Why not the TI-92?
From: Modem Boy <modemguy@geocities.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 18:30:48 -0700
Organization: IDT (Best News In The World)
References: <19980527221039.27262.qmail@hotmail.com> <3570155C.275D8BD9@online.no> <3570B209.4BDD1352@aol.com> <3571CC5C.DDA406DD@online.no> <357332DB.75B06091@aol.com> <35733C9F.51EF@geocities.com> <35759C70.69F28210@ameritech.net>
Reply-To: modemguy@geocities.com
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:23287

Tucker wrote:
>
> If the TI-89 is powerful enough, they can make a Z80 emulator (I doubt
> it though)

The TI-89 has a 10mhz 68000 Motorola CPU... I was thinking of *maybe*
replacing the 68000 cpu with a 68030 Mac (or even 68040) CPU... that
would kick, 33-66 mhz??? that would rock. Although, I'd rather read up
on someone else's attempts. ;)

TI-92's use Fargo, I think Fargo is VERY different compared to ZShell,
AShell, or any other type of shell/emulator for the sub-89 calculators.

-(:P Modem Boy d:)-
-(:P -=TI=86=- d:)-
-(:P Sub=Space d:)-

Own a TI-86 and ASE v1.3 or Rascall? Visit:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/5027/tiprog.html
for Compatible ASM programs that work on the TI-86! (updated 5/29)

References:

From:

From:

From:

Re: Why not the TI-92?

From: Jack the Klipper <toru@ONLINE.NO>

Re: Why not the TI-92?

From: Todd Stanley <toddestan@AOL.COM>

Re: Why not the TI-92?

From: Modem Boy <modemguy@geocities.com>

Re: Why not the TI-92?

From: Tucker <tucker1@ameritech.net>