Re: Why not the TI-92?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Why not the TI-92?
From: Todd Stanley <toddestan@AOL.COM>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 18:01:47 -0500
Organization: SCI
References: <19980527221039.27262.qmail@hotmail.com> <3570155C.275D8BD9@online.no> <3570B209.4BDD1352@aol.com> <3571CC5C.DDA406DD@online.no>
Reply-To: Todd Stanley <toddestan@AOL.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:23224

Jack the Klipper wrote:
>
> Could be. But I forgot to mention that you also have to think about how long
> the calc has been on the market. Calcs which have been available for a long
> time, naturally have more program for them.
>
 Well the TI-81 is older than the TI-85, but has less programs.
However, the 81 does not have a linkport.

I think the usage might be a way to test.  There are more TI-85's
amongst us than any other calculator, I imagine.

I think the problem is with this favorite/best calculator is that no TI
does everything.  The TI-92 is missing things the 86 has.  The 86 has a
lot of the stuff the 83 has, but not everything (it lacks in statistics
& finance).  The 86 is not even as fast as the 85.  The 83 has a lot
that the 85 doesn't have, but not everything.

Basically, what I am saying is that no TI calculator has ALL of the
features of the other models.  Maybe the 89 will solve this dilemma, but
I doubt it.

Todd

Follow-Ups:

Re: Why not the TI-92?

From: Steven Mohr <iwp@TABLE.JPS.NET>

Re: Why not the TI-92?

From: Modem Boy <modemguy@geocities.com>

References:

From:

From:

From:

Re: Why not the TI-92?

From: Jack the Klipper <toru@ONLINE.NO>

Prev: Re: TI Pictures
Next: Re: Why not the TI-92?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread