Re: Why not the TI-92?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Why not the TI-92?
Could be. But I forgot to mention that you also have to think about how long
the calc has been on the market. Calcs which have been available for a long
time, naturally have more program for them.
Todd Stanley wrote:
> By your logic, I beleive the TI-85 will be the winner by far...
>
> Todd
>
> Jack the Klipper wrote:
> >
> > There have been so many threads and replies to the original message so I
> > can't say the 92 is being overlooked. I think the best way to determine
> > what calc's the best, you must look at all the (good) games and programs
> > for each calc. (Porgrams designed esecially for the calc, not programs
> > the calc can use because it is compatible with older calcs.)
> > The ones with great gamed and programs probably have many useres, making
> > it popular.
> >
> > Tomas C wrote:
> >
> > > >Midnight Wells wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >What is confusing me is that there appear to be very few responses
> > > >listing the TI-92 as the favourite calculator
> > > >
> > >
> > > Personally I would have to say that the TI-92 is being overlooked for
> > > 2 main reasons. It's size and the fact that it hasn't been around as
> > > long. The 85 and the 82 calcs have been around for 5 plus years
> > > and the 83s and 86s are just improvments on them.
> > >
> > > Tomas C
> > >
> > > Ps. Even thought the excuse given for the 92 not being allowed on
> > > the SATs is the qwerty keypad, I believe the truth is that they are
> > > afraid of the symbolic manipulation, but we will have to see if the
> > > 89s are allowed.
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________
> > > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> >
> > --
> > Jack the Klipper
> > http://home.sol.no/~tursin/
> > ICQ: 9900377
--
Jack the Klipper
http://home.sol.no/~tursin/
ICQ: 9900377
Follow-Ups:
References: