Re: ASM Question
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ASM Question
At 10:00 AM 10/4/97 GMT, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
>If you would have read it, you would have
>seen that I say that it *would* be possible, though tedious, when you
>have the source. Along with that, I told them they'd have to bug the
>programmer about it.
Heheheh, and if you had read the post YOU replied to, you would have seen
that I said they could compile the asm source with this addon, thus making
your little addition here completely..... idiotic.
>Now, could everyone *please* stop posting without reading what they
>are flaming? Makes everyone look rather stupid.
Hmmm.... good advice..... do you follow it, or just repeat it?
----------------------------------------------
| Joseph M. Gaffney - gaffney@thethinker.com |
| IRC: CuCullin, RmMinusRf |
| http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/ |
| /server irc.pagannet.org 10000 |
----------------------------------------------
Follow-Ups:
References: