Re: ASM Question

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: ASM Question
From: Reinier Zwitserloot <R.Zwitserloot@BTINTERNET.COM>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 10:00:32 GMT
Organization: BT Internet
References: <610v93$oo8@camel18.mindspring.com> <3.0.1.32.19971003153848.007d3240@www.thethinker.com>
Reply-To: Reinier Zwitserloot <R.Zwitserloot@BTINTERNET.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:17424

>hmmmmmmm........

>Now, as I goddamn said before you dared contradict me, it isn't perfect,
>but it sure as hell isn't that bad of an attempt.

Before posting offensive comments like that you really ought to read
the post you are flaming. If you would have read it, you would have
seen that I say that it *would* be possible, though tedious, when you
have the source. Along with that, I told them they'd have to bug the
programmer about it.

Now, could everyone *please* stop posting without reading what they
are flaming? Makes everyone look rather stupid.

Follow-Ups:

Re: ASM Question

From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>

References:

ASM Question

From: Jeff Larkin <jlarkin@mindspring.com>

Re: ASM Question

From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>

Prev: inferred?
Next: Re: Ti-86 in the UK??
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread