Re: ASM Question

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: ASM Question
From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 15:38:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: <34350cab.622676@news.btinternet.com>
References: <610v93$oo8@camel18.mindspring.com>
Reply-To: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>

At 03:28 PM 10/3/97 GMT, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
>Now stop whining about it. it can't be done.

Is that right? Well, perhaps you should go to

http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/TI86/85-86.h

hmmmmmmm........

Now, as I goddamn said before you dared contradict me, it isn't perfect,
but it sure as hell isn't that bad of an attempt.

Just replace ti-85.h with 85-86.h, and .ORG 0 with .ORG PROG_ADDR, then
compile and youre set.


 ----------------------------------------------
|  Joseph M. Gaffney - gaffney@thethinker.com  |
|          IRC: CuCullin, RmMinusRf            |
|  http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/  |
|        /server irc.pagannet.org 6667         |
 ----------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:

Re: ASM Question

From: Jimmy Merdell <mja@algonet.se>

Re: ASM Question

From: Reinier Zwitserloot <R.Zwitserloot@BTINTERNET.COM>

References:

ASM Question

From: Jeff Larkin <jlarkin@mindspring.com>

Re: ASM Question

From: Reinier Zwitserloot <R.Zwitserloot@BTINTERNET.COM>