Re: A92: tigcc
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A92: tigcc
Mathieu Lacage wrote:
> NCSU <elada@unity.ncsu.edu> writes:
>
> > Could someone please tell me how to pipe the output of tigcc. I can't
> > read all the errors I'm getting from my buggy programs. A simple
> > 'tigcc satt.c > satt.err" doesn't work. Thanks a lot for any help or
> > advice anyone could give me
>
> you running windoze aren't you ?
> If so, just try to download cygnus unix tools.
>
> If not: try :
> tigcc satt.c 2>&1 |tee satt.err|less
> or more simply,
> tigcc satt.c 2>&1 |less
>
> This will siply redirect the error output to the standard output
> which can be lessed...
>
> >
> > P.S.
> > I really appreciate all the work that the doors folks and many
> > others have done to creating a programming environment for the ti.
> > However I think it would be great if more of the source code would be
>
> As far as tigcc is concerned, i think that full source should
> be available. If it is not, the authors are violating the gcc
> GNU GPL licence.
>
> > published. This would enable other programers to modify and improve
> > upon the applications. While most programs are great in their own
> > right, and all represent a tremendous commitment of time, some do have
> > bugs and noticeable ommisions. I am mainly speaking of floating support
> > for tigcc, screen problems with db92, and missing files with the 'latest
> > developer version' of doors. People could post updates and improvements
> > to programs. The original authors would'nt have to spend so much time
> > writting all the code themselves. Rather than jealeosly guarding the
> > code within their own little group, i think it would be neat if code
> > were more free and open. It would also solve the problem of people
> > asking how to create a pipe.
>
> yes, i miss this also
>
> >
> > Thank you for your time!
> >
> > Linux should be the programming model not Windows.
Thanks for the help. I will try to dl the kit if I can find time!
Thanks
References: