Re: A92: tigcc
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A92: tigcc
NCSU <elada@unity.ncsu.edu> writes:
> Could someone please tell me how to pipe the output of tigcc. I can't
> read all the errors I'm getting from my buggy programs. A simple
> 'tigcc satt.c > satt.err" doesn't work. Thanks a lot for any help or
> advice anyone could give me
you running windoze aren't you ?
If so, just try to download cygnus unix tools.
If not: try :
tigcc satt.c 2>&1 |tee satt.err|less
or more simply,
tigcc satt.c 2>&1 |less
This will siply redirect the error output to the standard output
which can be lessed...
>
> P.S.
> I really appreciate all the work that the doors folks and many
> others have done to creating a programming environment for the ti.
> However I think it would be great if more of the source code would be
As far as tigcc is concerned, i think that full source should
be available. If it is not, the authors are violating the gcc
GNU GPL licence.
> published. This would enable other programers to modify and improve
> upon the applications. While most programs are great in their own
> right, and all represent a tremendous commitment of time, some do have
> bugs and noticeable ommisions. I am mainly speaking of floating support
> for tigcc, screen problems with db92, and missing files with the 'latest
> developer version' of doors. People could post updates and improvements
> to programs. The original authors would'nt have to spend so much time
> writting all the code themselves. Rather than jealeosly guarding the
> code within their own little group, i think it would be neat if code
> were more free and open. It would also solve the problem of people
> asking how to create a pipe.
yes, i miss this also
>
> Thank you for your time!
>
> Linux should be the programming model not Windows.
Follow-Ups:
References: