Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775
From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 21:39:03 -0500
Organization: Expert Internet Services
References: <002101bf1514$ea5484c0$f502e0c7@desktop>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Actually, no... I have not. =(

I have looked in many stores for the fabled 'Hardware Version 2.00' TI-89s,
but to no avail... =(

I might just have to buy another TI-89 to actually see this spark new gossip
topic. =P

-Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/

----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Noveck <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775


> >Here, here!  Finally a guy with sense! =)
> >
> >- -Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
> >ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
> >http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
>
> No, Miles, he's WRONG in this instance -- sure, the programs can be
patched,
> but the NEW 89s with the Hardware version dispayed ARE DIFFERENT - have
you
> actually seen one of these?
>
>             -Scott Noveck
>              ACZ Member
>              http://scott.acz.org <-- coming soon =)

References:

Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775

From: "Scott Noveck" <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>

Prev: A89: placing data into C variables from ASM(" ") constructs
Next: Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread