Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775
From: "Scott Noveck" <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 20:50:14 -0400
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


>Here, here!  Finally a guy with sense! =)
>
>- -Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
>ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
>http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/

No, Miles, he's WRONG in this instance -- sure, the programs can be patched,
but the NEW 89s with the Hardware version dispayed ARE DIFFERENT - have you
actually seen one of these?

            -Scott Noveck
             ACZ Member
             http://scott.acz.org <-- coming soon =)

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: Re: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775

From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>

Prev: A89: Re: Hardware 2.00/ROM 1.05 (was Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #775)
Next: A89: placing data into C variables from ASM(" ") constructs
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread