Re: A89: Alignment Error


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: Alignment Error




Serial wrote:
> 
> I cant explain it I admit that. We dont know everything about the human
> genome and we know even less about the capability of human life but Like i
> said I can believe it was a miracle if you want but I wouldn't bet my life
> on it if I were you

But as you pointed out earlier, it is fact if it is within scientific
limits.  Was it not fact that this Priest had cancer?
     - Matthew

> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: mhlandry <mhlandry@bellsouth.net>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 5:25 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Alignment Error
> 
> >
> > If it was natural defences, then why didnt the doctors tell him that is
> > was natural defences?  Simply, because they had scientifically figured
> > out that natural defences are very inadequate when dealing with cancer
> > (especially cancer that eats away at your tissue so that you wake up
> > with blood in your mouth every morning).
> >      - Matthew
> >
> > Serial wrote:
> > >
> > > Antibodies? hm. Problebly not. Kemotherpy .. problebly. Natural defences
> at
> > > works can problebly be accountable for this. It could be a miracle. I
> sure
> > > as heck know I'm not going to get the same unless I get kemotherpy.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: mhlandry <mhlandry@bellsouth.net>
> > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 5:11 PM
> > > Subject: Re: A89: Alignment Error
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I bet you guys are getting pretty of tired with me about now.
> > > >
> > > > You touch on a very controversial, at least in my mind, topic.  "It is
> > > > fact if and only if it is within scientic limits."  He pushed it apart
> > > > with his will because God was with him and as we all know (hehe) God
> has
> > > > power over everythinng.  If however, you are looking for something
> > > > tangible, then religion is not it.
> > > >
> > > > Now, here is a true situation, please make me understand this
> > > > scientifically:
> > > >      The Priest at my highschool developed cancer.  It started
> > > > spreading.  Then, just before the cancer started spreading to his
> brain
> > > > all signs of the cancer disapeared.  The doctors said it was because
> of
> > > > radiation (I think), but he had undergone NO radiation treatments, not
> a
> > > > single one.  Explain that.  Moreover, the cancer came back, and
> started
> > > > spreading again.  He died Monday.  Scientifically, the doctors said he
> > > > was cured because of treatment that he had not undergone!  Then the
> > > > cancer, which the doctors said was gone (scientifically of course)
> came
> > > > back.  Please do explain this one to me.
> > > >      - Matthew
> >
> >


Follow-Ups: References: