Re: A89: Alignment Error
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Alignment Error
If it was natural defences, then why didnt the doctors tell him that is
was natural defences? Simply, because they had scientifically figured
out that natural defences are very inadequate when dealing with cancer
(especially cancer that eats away at your tissue so that you wake up
with blood in your mouth every morning).
- Matthew
Serial wrote:
>
> Antibodies? hm. Problebly not. Kemotherpy .. problebly. Natural defences at
> works can problebly be accountable for this. It could be a miracle. I sure
> as heck know I'm not going to get the same unless I get kemotherpy.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: mhlandry <mhlandry@bellsouth.net>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 5:11 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Alignment Error
>
> >
> > I bet you guys are getting pretty of tired with me about now.
> >
> > You touch on a very controversial, at least in my mind, topic. "It is
> > fact if and only if it is within scientic limits." He pushed it apart
> > with his will because God was with him and as we all know (hehe) God has
> > power over everythinng. If however, you are looking for something
> > tangible, then religion is not it.
> >
> > Now, here is a true situation, please make me understand this
> > scientifically:
> > The Priest at my highschool developed cancer. It started
> > spreading. Then, just before the cancer started spreading to his brain
> > all signs of the cancer disapeared. The doctors said it was because of
> > radiation (I think), but he had undergone NO radiation treatments, not a
> > single one. Explain that. Moreover, the cancer came back, and started
> > spreading again. He died Monday. Scientifically, the doctors said he
> > was cured because of treatment that he had not undergone! Then the
> > cancer, which the doctors said was gone (scientifically of course) came
> > back. Please do explain this one to me.
> > - Matthew
Follow-Ups:
References: