Re: A86: SAT Package

Re: A86: SAT Package

• To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: A86: SAT Package
• From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>
• Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 00:33:03 -0500
• Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• References: <19990411002400.89072.qmail@hotmail.com> <370F4290.FAD7D2C6@home.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

I think you meant "compression", not "compiler" :)

I've had better results when using Lite86, but there is an on-calc version
of Bloat and there isn't one for Lite86, so that might make your decision
for you.  They use different algorithms, so you should try them both and see
which gives you better results.  In thiscase, size is all that matters.

>
> what do you think is the best program compiler, bloat or Lite86?
>
>

• Re: A86: SAT Package
• From: "Cavan Carroll" <cavanc@hotmail.com>
• Re: A86: SAT Package
• From: Jeffrey Malone <ieatlint@home.com>

• Prev: A86: Re: [OT]
• Next: A86: Re: Random Numbers
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread