Re: A85: Shells and games
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A85: Shells and games
WHAT IS THE POINT OF NOT WRITING FOR A CERTAIN SHELL....what to you have
a stick up your butt with Usgard that makes you unable to program in it.
JUST SHUT UP....
-GreenLazer@juno.com
- "I hate a Roman named Status Quo." -Ray Bradbury
- If the TI-85 was an egg, it couldn't hatch because it would
have to many shells!
On Sat, 13 Sep 1997 22:43:45 -0500 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
<mozart@technologist.com> writes:
>Jimmy Mårdell wrote:
>> Well, YOUR programs would be smaller if made for Usgard, so I don't
>> really get your point... by making your own routines instead of use
>OS
>> built in routines, the program gets bigger.
>
>None of my programs use anything that Usgard has in it.. Therefore my
>programs wouldn't be any smaller if I used usgard!
>
>> I wouldn't say that you're an optimiztion nut, rather someone who
>wants
>> to write all code by yourself (ie not use other peoples routines).
>
>See above statement!
>
>> ...even though it gets bigger in the end. Well, it's your choice.
>What
>> is this OS/7 really? Never heard of it. I don't like phatos
>relocation
>
>OS/7.. It's the smallest shell released.. I like the author's
>attitude,
>though.. Just made it for himself, released it, and doesn't give a
>shit
>if people use it or not (unlike certain OTHER shellmakers out there..)
>
>> because it limits the programming possibilities. If you don't update
>the
>> VAT, you can't even use external variables.
>
>None of my programs NEED to use external variables..
>
>> You must make strange programs...
>
>Oh, so just because I don't use what Usgard has in it my programs are
>strange?
>
>Don't any of you read the messages? My comment was that the Shell
>that
>is best for a programmer all depends on what he programs, and has
>nothing to do with his competence!! But a whole bunch of you seem
>stuck
>on thinking that what you prefer HAS to be best for everyone!!
>
>--
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>* Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart *
>* <mozart@technologist.com> *
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
References: