Re: A83: ROMcall reference [83]
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A83: ROMcall reference [83]
> With this second note I didn't wanted to say that everything Ti's says is
> incorrect, just that there are differences between the Ti-83+ the Ti-83.
> This call is described in the 83+SDK as a 'special' app ROMcall. And the
> Ti-83 (without plus) defenitely hasn't got app-capabilities, so...
...Well, I assume that this works exactly the same on the 83 as those sorts
of things changed very little between the two calculators. As for
applications, the 83 definitly has support for applications (That's what Y=,
Stat Editor, Homescreen, etc. are), just not support for external
applications. The 83 Plus external application format is based upon the
internal applications format handed down from the 83, thus much is very
similar, if not identical.
-Dan Englender
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henk Poley" <HPoley@DDS.nl>
To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: A83: ROMcall reference [83]
>
> Dan Englender:
> .... All the stuff you quoted from the SDK about JForceCmdNoChar is
> accurate...
>
> +- _JforceCmdNoChaR
> +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
> | SQUISH.INC | ???? | ???? | ???? | ???? | ???? | ???? |
> 4024 |
>
>
+-------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------
>
> +
> | JP to: | ???? | ???? | ???? | ???? | ???? | ???? |
> 043A |
>
>
+-------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------
>
> +
> ....
> ....
> Note2: This info is taken from an 83+ SDK, so some things maybe
> incorrect...
>
> With this second note I didn't wanted to say that everything Ti's says is
> incorrect, just that there are differences between the Ti-83+ the Ti-83.
> This call is described in the 83+SDK as a 'special' app ROMcall. And the
> Ti-83 (without plus) defenitely hasn't got app-capabilities, so...
>
> Henk Poley
>
> -----
> The end of the world is nigh...
>
References: