The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: Void Productions returns to ticalc.org
|
Mário Rui Luzeiro
|
nice...
thats a great team and this move from calc.org to ticalc.org is signal that Void Productions is alive and come to the live side :)
we are waiting for your productions ...
yeee USA 3 - 2 Portugal :((((
(yes I'm Portuguese :)
|
|
5 June 2002, 14:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Void Productions returns to ticalc.org
|
Nick Disabato
(Web Page)
|
Alright, I'm going to step out of the woodwork (during exams, no less) and cry foul on this one. No offense to the guy who wrote the .sig, because you probably had no say in the initial matter (and I doubt I'd care, even if you did), but I have a few points to bring up.
Point the first.
The quality of ticalc.org's boards are, quite simply, a function of two things: the ability for the moderators to keep up deleting off-topic and unconstructive posts, and the ability of ticalc.org's user based to engage in some kind of mature, rational discussion over whatever's being brought up. Infrequent checkings of the boards show a total, flagrant, and unapologetic disregard for the latter point.
That said, I have no idea how much the moderators are working to moderate. I do know this, though: remember when I was news editor here? I do. I remember when I deleted upwards of fifty posts a week: sometimes more than a hundred. Sad but true, but this led to some pretty decent conversations sometimes: ones that I actually took pleasure in participating in. And why?
Because people would relentlessly, callously troll. Because people would write "First Post!" Because people would engage in swearing matches. Because people would write ASCII art. None of this has stopped, but unfortunately it has continued on unchecked.
Because what the TI community was once - a group that fostered its own, a group that put out some really fantastic assembly programs, a group that gave more of a damn about writing and creating than it did about street cred - is now irrevocably and unquestionably dead.
And you have nobody to blame for it but yourselves.
There is no second point, because I have to finish a lab report and I can't come up with anything else clever right now.
- Nick
|
|
7 June 2002, 20:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Void Productions returns to ticalc.org
|
rmohr02
(Web Page)
|
"Forums are even harder to read. All those threads ... at least this way each board has only a few hundred posts as opposed to a thousand ..."
I'm assuming you mean /.'s forums are harder to read than ticalc.org's, but I must disagree. There may be upwards of a thousand comments on some of /.'s articles, but you can choose only to view the very best, the good, the average, or all of the comments. This can cut down 1000 posts to roughly 100 (i.e., if you choose to view only the very best comments).
Also, ticalc.org gets nowhere near the traffic of /.--ticalc.org serves 195 thousand requests per day (see About, Web Server Statistics), and /. serves upwards of 1 million requests daily (FAQ, About /.).
|
|
10 June 2002, 03:15 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|