Rejoice in Meaningless Statistics

Basics	Archives	Community	Services	Programming
Hardware	Help	About	Search	Your Account

Home :: Archives :: News :: Rejoice in Meaningless Statistics

Rejoice in Meaningless Statistics
Posted by Eric on 10 December 2001, 08:17 GMT

Here at ticalc.org we're happy to announce we've recently passed the 4-terabyte mark for total transferred data through HTTP. We've also served up 250 million requests since we started keeping track of such things on April 14, 1997. Full webserver statistics can be found here. Thanks to all for your patronage!

The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.

Re: Rejoice in Meaningless Statistics
benthomas
Wow
	10 December 2001, 08:43 GMT

Re: Re: Rejoice in Meaningless Statistics
roms (Web Page)
Amazing !!! Keep up the good work and a long life to www.ticalc.org :-))
	10 December 2001, 11:29 GMT

Re: Rejoice in Meaningless Statistics
lord_nightrose (Web Page)
w00t. Nice job. I'M #1 MOST DOWNLOADED THIS WEEK!!! ROXXOR! Okay, anyway. Yeah. That's really impressive. I'm not surprised, though. You guys are pretty much the source for calculator programs and information these days.
	10 December 2001, 14:49 GMT

File download statistics
Patrick Davidson (Web Page)
What exactly is the current schedule for updating the toplists? It certainly seems to me that the totals are less than a whole week's worth.
	10 December 2001, 17:43 GMT

Re: File download statistics
Robert Mohr (Web Page)
I believe it resets at 12:00M Sunday morning.
	10 December 2001, 21:25 GMT

Re: Re: File download statistics
S. G. (Web Page)
If it were truly 12:00M, it wouldn't be Sunday morning. It would be 12:00M between Saturdays and Sundays. It doesn't belong to either day; it's a dividing line. Just like the present is neither past nor future.
	11 December 2001, 22:00 GMT

Re: Re: Re: File download statistics
Benjamin Esham (Web Page)
What I don't get is this: you have 7pm, then 8pm, 9pm, 10pm, 11pm, and then- 12am! Why isn't midnight 12 o'clock PM?
	12 December 2001, 00:36 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: File download statistics
Barrett Anderson (Web Page)
well... (this is what i think)... someone decided to have 24 hour days... then someone decided to divide the day in to 2 12 hour parts, so they started at 0am, then 1am,2am, 3am,4am,5am,6am,7am, 8am,9am,10am,11am, 0pm, 1pm, 2pm etc... but they didn't like saying 0-oclock, so they made it twelve...
	12 December 2001, 01:42 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: File download statistics
tge82
Heck, I just use 24-hour (a.k.a. military) time! It's less confusing than this. :-)
	13 December 2001, 18:38 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: File download statistics
lord_nightrose (Web Page)
I use the 16-hour clock provided to me by Gene Ray , purveyor of TimeCube goods. http://timecube.com/index15.html
	16 December 2001, 07:32 GMT

Re: Rejoice in Meaningless Statistics
ricardito (Web Page)
Fantastic People!!!! Keep it up!
	10 December 2001, 18:12 GMT

Re: Rejoice in Meaningless Statistics
no_one_2000_
go ticalc! Oh yeah oh yeah oh yeah oh yeah oh yeah oh yeah oh yeah
	10 December 2001, 23:05 GMT

Re: Rejoice in Meaningless Statistics
aksuur
didnt they do a news item on this same subject a while back?
	10 December 2001, 23:06 GMT

Re: Re: Rejoice in Meaningless Statistics
Chickendude
Yeah, I think so. Check the April 3rd 2001 (or 4th; somewhere around there) news item.
	12 December 2001, 03:48 GMT

Re: Rejoice in Meaningless Statistics
calcman03
Hey ticalc.org is kick ass. No other website is better than ticalc.org
	13 December 2001, 23:59 GMT