The Future of Calculators?
Posted by Eric on 14 February 2001, 23:07 GMT
Isaac (yeah, that Isaac) sent me a link today about the recent cancellation of a calculator-handheld combo by that other calculator maker. Apparently HP has decided that the market isn't ready for their recently announced Xpander calculator-handheld, which ran the Windows CE operating system. Anyone have any ideas about what this means for the future? I've long thought that calculators would be eventually phased out and replaced by computers, but apparently this isn't going to happen yet. TI, on the other hand, (if you haven't heard about it already) has recently announced the TI-Navigator, a $9,800 system that allows wireless networking of TI-83+ calculators. So...with all this innovation, what's here to stay? Update (Eric): And in case you stumbled upon the CNET article about TI-Navigator and was thinking that "Michael Disabato" sounded a bit familiar, I can confirm that yes, the aforementioned figure is indeed the paternal unit of Nick. That is all.
|
|
|
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
The TI wireless network thing...
|
Matt Hockenheimer
|
The TI wireless network thing is probably just some evil scheme by teachers to spy on our calcs and delete all our games and cheat files! Down with the wireless TI-83!!!!!
Waitaminute... I have a TI-89, so I don't really care if all the people with TI-83s get screwed. Nevermind :)
(To all TI-83 owners without a sense of humor: I'm joking!)
|
|
15 February 2001, 01:53 GMT
|
|
Re: The Future of Calculators?
|
Peter Martijn Kuipers
(Web Page)
|
Wireless eh...
But I don't have an IR port on my 83+, so they probably want to put IR transceivers on every claassroom table... (if so, why not include the plain 83 calc into the network??? (they probably want to make the control software apps...)
But, if there needs to be a transceiver on every table, why wireless, it would be a lot cheaper to make wire-lan, not??
(BTW, anyone an idea about the protocolthey might use (TCP/IP or some TI-WIreless LAn Protocol (TIWILAP :-))
|
|
15 February 2001, 08:29 GMT
|
|
Progress, I think not.
|
Harper Maddox
(Web Page)
|
I think that the development and manufacturing of a system for networking Ti-83s (or any Graphing Calc) shows where we are going wrong with the educational system. This is not progress. This is reducing a student to a number, an IP address. For $9800 you get a nifty calculator LAN, so the teacher can sit behind a wall and monitor statistics of his/her students' calculator usage. This eliminates the teacher student relationship, which is, in many cases, necessary for learning to occur. I think we need to ask ourselves whether this technology is really useful. I, myself, would provide a definitive NO.
|
|
15 February 2001, 18:48 GMT
|
|
Re: The Future of Calculators?
|
David
|
A calculator running Windows CE and a $10,000 wireless network to connect TI-83's... Ok, I'm scared now. One of the nicest things about my TI-89 is that it DOESN'T run Windows :P Seriously though, $10,000 for a wireless TI-83 network seems kind of overkill. I mean, what's the point? _Most_ (all?) of the time, I know what I am doing on it better than my teacher does (every school has their calculator "expert" :P). What good would it do to have the teacher monetering it? I like having a certain level of privacy while I use it, even though I really have nothing to hide anyway. I just think that it's annoying when someone watches me use it from behind my back (I'm assuming the software would allow a teacher to do that). Oh well. I'm graduating in a few months anyway, so I don't really care what they do. :)
|
|
15 February 2001, 20:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: The Future of Calculators?
|
GavinO
(Web Page)
|
I have a Compaq C-120++, but it is terribly bad for math stuff. The huge screen, keyboard, SH3 chip, nad 4megs of RAM make it great for word processing and spreadsheets, along with gaming, but for math stuff I break out the 83. THe WinCE environment just isn't geared towards graphing calculator apps. To make a CE app, you must give Microsoft money for the SDK, and thus the app is going to cost money to the customer. With the 83, I have an all-purpose math tool, and I can program in frequently used formulas (and other things . . .) With the 89, this is even moreso true, with the equation builder type stuff.
|
|
16 February 2001, 21:06 GMT
|
|
Possible use, but not in math
|
pantherace13
|
I can see a possible use for English classes. Seriously, most of the text book in any High School English class are already at Project Gutenberg. You could have a class walk in, download their "books" and assignment and get started.
Yes, I know ebooks are only for 89/92+ RIGHT NOW, but that will change. (Just wait)
Anyone who says that that isn't possible should talk to the English teacher I had last semester, and read most of the books on an 89 for that class (after the first half, when I didn't have it)
Now, if we could just get to play with one of these, we would know if it were possible. However, I doubt that our school district will get any anytime, as a Pentium II is considered one of the best computers on campus, and there are only 3 I know about on campus, and all running windows including 486-33s
|
|
15 February 2001, 22:23 GMT
|
|
Re: The Future of Calculators?
|
HistoricBruno
(Web Page)
|
Instead of a $10,000 networking kit for an 83+, why not buy a car, or a laptop, and still have money left over?
I know somebody with a wireless link that they bought off the internet. It didn't work and had few instructions! I mean come on, the reason somebody buys an 83+ is because they are cheap. This idea would be feasible for a computer, but a calculator? Whats the world coming to?
|
|
15 February 2001, 22:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: The Future of Calculators?
|
David
|
My school is notorious for making random decisions. You see, whether a school gets it or not entirely depends on whether TI can convince the Powers that Be at any given school that they absolutely must spend $10,000 so that they can make sure 30 (or whatever) students aren’t sleeping or playing games on their calculators.
“It's a simple thing. Teachers can pause and, for instance, send three multiple choice questions to gauge if the students are paying attention [comment: couldn’t the teacher just pause and _look_ at the class instead of sorting through how many people respond to the question?]," he said. "A lot of educators say they want to be able to monitor if their lessons are being understood."
"...TI is already planning an upgrade to be released later this year that will let teachers beam homework assignments to their students' handhelds. When they next meet, the teacher can collect the work, all without a single piece of paper changing hands.” - CNET article
A school that is willing to consider this would be better off requiring moderately expensive laptops (hey, new technology vs price doubles every 18 months, and you don’t really need a Pentium 4 to do word processing). If you would already spend $100 - $150 for a calculator, why not, in the future, spend a few hundred on a laptop you can use in other courses? The laptops could then be fitted with wireless network cards that connect them to the school LAN, and they could get Internet access through the school. What about submitting homework? Well, you’re on a network with Internet access... shouldn’t be half as hard as submitting it from a calculator. This is great in every area except unless you wanted to use VTI and illegal roms, you would still need a calculator... or both :D
Calculator memory isn’t a safe place to store homework, and there isn’t even enough ram (TI-83) or screen size to justify using it in place of a computer. Editing your homework would take twice as long at least than if you had just done it on paper.
Want to fight this? Usually the math department head would be the one that recommends that the school purchase this system. All you have to do to fight this is casually mention this expensive joke that TI has pulled out of their hat to your math teacher before that person finds out from some other source that might lead them into buying it. Just make some side comment about how utterly useless this would really be, and you will do much to keep your school from ever getting it while you're there at least (I hope, though I wouldn’t really worry about this whole thing too much).
|
|
17 February 2001, 06:36 GMT
|
|
1 2
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|