ticalc.org
Basics Archives Community Services Programming
Hardware Help About Search Your Account
   Home :: Archives :: News :: MaxMem, TurboBreakOut, SolarStriker, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree

MaxMem, TurboBreakOut, SolarStriker, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree
Posted by Nick on 26 June 2000, 03:09 GMT

Many apologies for the total lack of news items lately: many things in meatspace took place the past week, ranging from the occasional bowling outage (oh, by the way, I got a 199) to a visitation from Mike "I Came To Chicago Just So I Could Say I Typed On Heatfactory" Knapp (of former #ti fame).

With that Update From Nick Disabato's Personal Life(TM) out of the way, here's "Der Neusposten:"

Julien Muchembled, I KISS YOU!!! Looks like the crafty little guy released a version of Maxmem for the 89 and the 92 Plus that works on AMS v2.04. Check it out if you enjoy procuring such fine games that happen to be obnoxiously oversized.

Flavien Racine decided, one fine summer day, to release TurboBreakOut 68K v1.80 onto an unsuspecting world. New features include French documentation, an enhanced appearance, bugfixes, bigger (by twofold) levels, a new backwards-compatible level format, and one extra set of external levels. Want it? I know I'd be drooling right now: to this end, 89, 92 (Fargo ][), and 92 Plus have been lovingly, painstakingly prepared for your consumption.

Benoit Scherrer and Brian Tribondeau have released this program - I think it's called "SolarStriker" - 89, 92 (Fargo Deux), and 92 Plus versions exist for you to "madly leechx0r." Rumor has it that this is the last (hence the word "Final") version to be created, unless something goes seriously hardcore horrorshow awry. *sob* Their programming talents will be missed.

 


The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.


Kissmahir?
CircaX  Account Info
(Web Page)

Kissmahir? What is this?

Did I miss something…?

     26 June 2000, 05:55 GMT


Re: Kissmahir?
Nick Disabato  Account Info
(Web Page)

Yes :(
Kiss Mahir was a site that was posted on Xoom a LONG time ago, when Xoom was just starting up.

It immediately caught popularity from, well, *everybody* and now he has a domain name and a new page.

If you saw the Webby Awards this year, you would know that he presented the award for best personal site, which went to cockybastard.com.

Both fine sites, imo, in their own interesting ways.

--BlueCalx

     26 June 2000, 07:16 GMT

Re: MaxMem, TurboBreakOut, SolarStriker, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree
eggo

Further proof that the world revolves around me, I don't check this page for fuor days--there are no news items for four days. coincidence? i think not (well, maybe).
the black helicopters are circling...

eggo

     26 June 2000, 06:51 GMT

Re: MaxMem, TurboBreakOut, SolarStriker, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree
Operations  Account Info

nick, the write of this column, did you read clockwork orange? or did you just see stanley kubricks bits and peices of torn apart sex and good literature?

     26 June 2000, 09:18 GMT


Re: Re: MaxMem, TurboBreakOut, SolarStriker, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree
Nick Disabato  Account Info
(Web Page)

Just bought the book. I'm on page 30.

You should read nickd.org more often: you would have known the answer to that one! :)

--BlueCalx

     26 June 2000, 18:11 GMT

Re: MaxMem, TurboBreakOut, SolarStriker, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree
Reno  Account Info

Not to be a party pooper, but MaxMem was supposed to be a TI-FR exclusive program...

     26 June 2000, 17:16 GMT


Re: Re: MaxMem, TurboBreakOut, SolarStriker, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree
Nick Disabato  Account Info
(Web Page)

The author uploaded this his own very self.
It _was_ but not it's not.

Good for him :)

--BlueCalx

     26 June 2000, 18:36 GMT


Re: Re: Re: MaxMem, TurboBreakOut, SolarStriker, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree
JaggedFlame

Oh, boy, let's not start this again... :-)

-- JaggedFlame, who's had his fill of 'Area 51.5: The RPN Incident'

     26 June 2000, 21:03 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: MaxMem, TurboBreakOut, SolarStriker, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree
Amalfi Marini  Account Info

WOOAAH.... that was a real incident.... but it's a must to live any kind of things in your life. Incidents included. Here at ticalc we lived many things: surprises, deceptions, headaches(Ams2.03, etc), Humouristic posts, first comments eliminations, Incidents, ... Wow man , this is a cool site!

     27 June 2000, 00:50 GMT

Phoenix is dead!!!
Cpt.Ginyu

I will take that solar striker is not backwards compatible from the handy dandy little address error I got when I tried to run the phoenix level set. (sob)

     26 June 2000, 17:27 GMT


Re: Phoenix is dead!!!
Amalfi Marini  Account Info

phoenix is compatible with the old version of solar stricker. You can only use the levels included with the zip

     27 June 2000, 00:41 GMT

Re: MaxMem, TurboBreakOut, SolarStriker, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree
Marcos Lopez  Account Info
(Web Page)

TBO v1.80: Good job, Flavien! You are on the way to the POTM award!
SolarStriker:How can these french guys say that it's EASY??
Maxmem 2.00: I just love the new uninstall feature of MaxMex. Now you can temporarily restore your original FlashROM if you need to send the Product Code to another calc or whatever...

     26 June 2000, 18:12 GMT


Re: Re: MaxMem, TurboBreakOut, SolarStriker, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree
JaggedFlame

Yep, the new uninstall feature of MaxMex. :-D I know what you meant... I just couldn't resist, sorry... :-)

     26 June 2000, 21:04 GMT


Re: Re: Re: MaxMem, TurboBreakOut, SolarStriker, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree
Marcos Lopez  Account Info
(Web Page)

Hey, I was serious... =8-)

     26 June 2000, 22:48 GMT

Open source always??
Marcos Lopez  Account Info
(Web Page)

I don't know if you guys are aware of this: Apparently, a few days ago it was released at TI-FR a 'non original' version of Maxmex for AMS2.04, source code included! This version was made dissasembling the old Maxmem 1.00 by Julien Muchembled and doing the necessary changes to work on AMS2.04. What happended? Yes, Julien complained arguing that this kind of information shouldn't be distributed and the file was instantly removed from the TI-FR archives. Two days later he released Maxmem 2.00 (with no source, of course).

What do you think? Open source so that everybody can easily learn about the nasty tricks of all kind of programs or Closed source on this kind of dangerous information to avoid mentally retarded people to make FlashROM writing programs which could easily screw the calc up??

     26 June 2000, 18:15 GMT

Re: Open source always??
jaymz Account Info

I'd say closed source just so TI wouldn't be able to see how it's done. What they don't know can't hurt us :)

     26 June 2000, 18:52 GMT


Re: Re: Open source always??
Aaron Peterson  Account Info
(Web Page)

I think everything should be open source.

I'd like to check out the source for the 2.04 max mem.

I like to know the inner workings of stuff.

     27 June 2000, 07:02 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Open source always??
Sebastian Reichelt  Account Info
(Web Page)

Read the A89 mailing list. Zeljko already figured it out. (Of course, he won't release any source, which is good.)

     27 June 2000, 18:55 GMT

Re: Open source always??
James!  Account Info

I say closed source because there is absolutely no reason to write to protected areas of the FlashROM unless you are writing HW2patch or MaxMem, or a whole new operating system. Julien Muchembled handles writing HW2patch and MaxMem himself, so no one but him needs to know the highly dangerous routines he uses. If someone ever does write a new TI-OS, I'm sure Julien will be kind enough to reveal his methods to the authors of the new OS. Besides, if he reveals his methods, TI can block them with a new AMS or hardware version.

     27 June 2000, 03:09 GMT


Re: Re: Open source always??
Matt Landry  Account Info
(Web Page)

Sounds like you think that Julien is the only one who knows how to write to `protected memory addresses'. I sure hope not, because that just isn't true. There is even information posted on the web about writing to rom (mind you, this isnt source, but its better that way).

-Matthew

     27 June 2000, 04:49 GMT


Re: Open source always??
barich Account Info
(Web Page)

If it's closed source and Julien dies in a horrific accident, whatever will we do then?

If it's open source, we could see an invasion of calculator viruses that overwrite the protected flash and render the calculator unusable.

My opinion is closed, simply because I don't like the idea of too many people knowing how to do what Julien has figured out.

I am a fan of open source, though, but this just doesn't seem appropriate material for it.

     27 June 2000, 15:01 GMT


Re: Re: Open source always??
Sebastian Reichelt  Account Info
(Web Page)

Maybe Julien should release his source to some people he trusts, in case he resigns from the TI world. I'm definitely against open source in this case, although I'm a big fan of it and release all my programs here with their source.

     27 June 2000, 19:00 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Open source always??
barich Account Info
(Web Page)

That sounds good.

     28 June 2000, 02:33 GMT

1  2  3  

You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.

  Copyright © 1996-2012, the ticalc.org project. All rights reserved. | Contact Us | Disclaimer