The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: March and April 2000 POTM
|
JaggedFlame
|
Looks like TI-Chess blew everyone away...
|
|
2 May 2000, 01:38 GMT
|
|
Re: March and April 2000 POTM
|
Reno
|
April's selection doesn't seem too fair for the z80 calcs; too many damn good 89/92+ programs :)
|
|
2 May 2000, 02:18 GMT
|
|
Re: March and April 2000 POTM
|
DWedit
(Web Page)
|
Regardless of what is released, the stuff for the 68k calcs always wins.
|
|
2 May 2000, 03:04 GMT
|
|
Re: March and April 2000 POTM
|
Cigamit
(Web Page)
|
They really should have 2 seperate groups. Z80 and 86k. Then you pick 1 or 2 out of each group at there discrepency, depending on how many are entered.
Another solution (and probably the best) would be to just pick one for each calc. This gives a better portrayal of which programs are good for which calc.
|
|
2 May 2000, 03:57 GMT
|
|
Re: March and April 2000 POTM
|
Scott Noveck
(Web Page)
|
TI-Chess definately deserved that - it's an amazing program. If only I could figure out how to get loading/saving to work right, get castling to work (switch king/rook - what's the key combo?), and learn to beat the computer on the lowest dificulty more than 1 in 100 games - even WITH cheating. . . pr0ps to Thomas and the TI-Chess team
|
|
2 May 2000, 04:00 GMT
|
|
Re: March and April 2000 POTM
|
S67
(Web Page)
|
I think fact maxmem might be the only utility to win the POTM. I mean, any program that gives me 200 K more of archive is something that I like.
|
|
2 May 2000, 05:13 GMT
|
|
Re: March and April 2000 POTM
|
MathJMendl
(Web Page)
|
People are always complaining about how the categories are all lumped together. I personally think that this is unavoidable with the number of possible selections, as many categories barely have any programs. One possible idea might be to increase the selections for the vote or to even make make the vote every other month. Although, when you think about it, most of the programs that make it to the vote are already some of the month's best, so it seems that it is a little redundant to have a vote on those very few every month...
|
|
2 May 2000, 05:24 GMT
|
|
Re: March and April 2000 POTM
|
tnussb
|
Thanx to everyone who have voted for TI-Chess as POTM. My motivation to keep on with that project "makes a high leap" =8-)
|
|
2 May 2000, 10:00 GMT
|
|
Re: March and April 2000 POTM
|
Scott Uhl
(Web Page)
|
Come on! Put back the old one! There is no point in voting! Now it's just a 89/92 voting, no other calculators have more than 2 programs to vote for!
|
|
2 May 2000, 23:09 GMT
|
|
Re: March and April 2000 POTM
|
Paul Zipfel
(Web Page)
|
It was nice to see a BASIC program on the list. Especially a TI-83 one at that. Way to go, SiCoDe.
|
|
3 May 2000, 00:04 GMT
|
|
|