Win95.CIH Spotted In 83PlusAsm v1.01
Posted by Nick on 23 March 2000, 23:37 GMT
Well.. this is a piece of sour news. From bombing the chem test to getting waitlisted at Washington University to this. Last night, a file was added that contained the Win95.CIH virus. THIS FILE WILL CAUSE YOUR SYSTEM TO CEASE FUNCTIONING ON THE 26TH OF ANY MONTH! For those of you who can't tell the emboldened red text apart from everything else, this is a very bad thing. The program was called 83PlusAsm v1.01; it had 255 downloads before we removed it from our archives. If you downloaded this file, do a virus scan of your machine IMMEDIATELY or head to this page to get an online scan of your system. If you have any problems with disinfecting your system, head over to this page or email me. DO THIS PROMPTLY - Win95.CIH WILL RENDER YOUR MACHINE INOPERABLE AFTER MARCH 26TH! We apologize for any problems this may cause anyone. Any other TI sites - scan your systems if you added this file. Once again, if you have ANY problems with getting this virus off your computer, email me and I'll try to make my response as prompt as possible. Update (Nick): An esteemed colleague, David Hall, has informed me of a free virus scanner with free updates. You can find a copy of it here. Update (Nick): Another kind-hearted person, Matt, has given me the linkage to a disk recovery tool called SpinRite. This can even be used after the virus goes off. I don't know how much it can help people, but it's there. (Updated with correct link)
|
|
|
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: Win95.CIH Spotted In 83PlusAsm v1.01
|
DWedit
(Web Page)
|
I think the virus is CIH v1.2, which only works on april 26. But I might be wrong
|
|
24 March 2000, 06:34 GMT
|
|
Re: Win95.CIH Spotted In 83PlusAsm v1.01
|
peoples_champ
|
Good job Nick on finding the virus.
But one question, Why the hell didnt you check fo this earlier. You have probably ended up destoying several thousand hard drives and some people probably do not even know about it. Well at least you found it and we all have at least two days before doomsday on our computers
|
|
24 March 2000, 22:46 GMT
|
|
Re: Win95.CIH Spotted In 83PlusAsm v1.01
|
mad_scientist86
|
am i safe if i downloaded it, unziped it and left it a couple days before deleting it but, never ran it??
|
|
25 March 2000, 04:58 GMT
|
|
Fools!!!!
|
ikecam
(Web Page)
|
First of all, anyone out there that thinks Jeff Chai intentionally put the virus in the file is OBVIOUSLY an idiot. If he wanted to sabotage the TI community, he wouldn't have put his name on the file or taken responsibility for it. People need to stop jumping to conclusions.
Secondly, if you own an 83+, you deserve a virus anyway.
|
|
25 March 2000, 05:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reply to all the replies
|
Anubis
|
While it is true that you cannot use a 92+ on most tests (the standardized tests like SAT are what I am referring to), where I am (Tennessee) you can't use 89's either. Therefore, there is no value of an 89 over a 92+, other than size. While most of the features are the same, the 92+'s size does have advantages in my opinion. The larger keyboard has all F1-F8 keys (as opposed to 2nd+F1), and the qwerty keybaord is VERY handy (for programming purposes, too, more getkey values are easier to get to). A friend of mine has an 89, one he is very proud of. I find that people would rather use mine than his simply because my screen is easier to read and I have a keyboard while he doesn't. I still maintain the larger viewing screen is a definite plus. 86's are very nice indeed (several of my friends have those), but I dont think they come close to either 89/92+ because the latter have a LOT of useful built-in functions. Does ANYONE out ther have a 92+ and agree with me?
Again, only an opinion
-Anubis
|
|
27 March 2000, 03:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Fools!!!!
|
Juan Corral
(Web Page)
|
>> Secondly, if you own an 83+, you deserve a virus anyway.
Heh, ah man, those poor TI-83+ owners who want to learn ASM...
I agree with you, it wasn't Jeff Chai's fault. And everyone should run Virus Scanning software on anything they download. I personally do not have any, as I only download misc. programs in Linux. And if I happen to download a Windows program, I will get it from a big website like Download.com, Hotfiles.com, or Tucows, as they run virus checking software before hand.
If anyone got infected from ths file, I'm sorry for you.
|
|
25 March 2000, 07:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Fools!!!!
|
Etec
(Web Page)
|
oh f^&*, here we go again. What the hell is wrong with you, you must like starting ti wars. The TI-83 Plus is a good calculator, if you would give it a chance and if it is all you need. Owning a more advanced calculator when you don't need it makes you the idiot. You should post a reply saing "durrr, I'm ikecam and I'm an alcaholic, I have a dizease and they don't know what to call it." I'm tired of jackasses picking on the 83 Plus for no reason. Anyway, what the hell are you doing on this board, this has nothing to do with the 89,92, 85, 86, or any other calc. This has to do with the infection of a file about **the 83 Plus**.
P.S. ikecam, next time you come on this site your computer will download a 1k trojan which will enable me to remotely control your computer. Don't worry I'll only send a command to your Autoexec.bat file and add the command 'del win.com'. I'm sorry this will cause your computer not to boot windows. But please don't be afraid, you can still recover from dos, then next time I'll do something even more brutal.
|
|
26 March 2000, 00:50 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|