DMCA Battle Featured in WSJ
Posted by Michael on 16 November 2009, 03:38 GMT
The Wall Street Journal, the most widely circulated newspaper in the US, has published a lengthy feature on the TI calculator community. The article explores the motivations behind calculator programming and documents the history of the ongoing legal battle, but most importantly, it continues to raise awareness of the issue. Mr. Foster still declines to comment, but the article does contain a reply from a TI representative, even if only one line.
|
|
Reply to this article
|
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: DMCA Battle Featured in WSJ
|
Lewk
(Web Page)
|
"After two months of trying to crack the code -- a process that involved factoring two huge prime numbers"
Yes folks. We are just so damned good, we can actually factor prime numbers!
|
Reply to this comment
|
16 November 2009, 04:30 GMT
|
|
Re: DMCA Battle Featured in WSJ
|
Travis Evans
|
I seem to remember one other article that was published a little while back that had a comment from TI (though I can't remember which one). It was also very short, something to the effect of “The TI-OS software is copyrighted. We will protect our intellectual property.”
|
Reply to this comment
|
16 November 2009, 05:05 GMT
|
|
Re: DMCA Battle Featured in WSJ
|
Drew DeVault
(Web Page)
|
Is there any reason we can't send out a press release? Maybe tilt some articles in our favor, get some TV coverage...
|
Reply to this comment
|
17 November 2009, 13:45 GMT
|
|
Re: DMCA Battle Featured in WSJ
|
Jennifer Granick
(Web Page)
|
As yesterday's front page Wall Street Journal article makes clear, TI calculator hobbyists have every and any reason to want to hack their calculators. So why is TI sending cease and desist letters to people publishing the signing keys needed for installing custom operating systems? The company says that they are protecting their intellectual property, but for the reasons set forth in the letter the Electronic Frontier Foundation sent to TI (available on our website), publishing signing keys doesn't violate the law. TI tacitly accepts our view because they didn't respond to that letter, or to our subsequent DMCA safe harbor counter-notice, and our clients' posts are back online.
Everyone's case is different, but if you got a cease and desist letter demanding that you take down a post containing or discussing any of the currently released signing keys for one of TI's unencrypted operating systems, you may have the same legal grounds for resisting TI's demands. To learn more about your Coders' Rights, visit the URL above.
Jennifer Granick
Civil Liberties Director
Electronic Frontier Foundation
|
Reply to this comment
|
17 November 2009, 17:50 GMT
|
|
Re: DMCA Battle Featured in WSJ
|
Kevin Ouellet
(Web Page)
|
One thing I am curious about is if the laws and protections in Sweden would allow Ticalc.org to host the keys
|
Reply to this comment
|
19 November 2009, 21:59 GMT
|
|
1 2
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|