| 
| 
| 
September/October 2005 NewsletterPosted by Michael on 8 November 2005, 06:10 GMT
 Our newsletter editor, Jonathan, who these days finds his worth depreciating faster than a used Ford Pinto, has finally released the latest edition of the ticalc.org newsletter. With him being a week late with this September/October 2005 issue, we hope that Jon is not ever placed in charge of time-sensitive NASA missions. As always, we encourage you to subscribe if you have not yet done so. |  |  
| Reply to this article |  
 
 
| 
| 
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors.  Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
 |  |  
| 
 
| Re: September/October 2005 Newsletter |  
| Calcinator   |  
| 
Wow. That took a while...
 |  
| Reply to this comment | 8 November 2005, 12:07 GMT |  |  
| 
 
| Re: September/October 2005 Newsletter |  
| Snave2000   |  
| 
>>we hope that Jon is not ever placed in charge of time-sensitive NASA missions.
 I heartily agree!  Of course, I don't think NASA needs Jon to contribute delays to its missions; it manages to do that well enough on its own. (unfortunately for the future of spaceflight...)
 |  
| Reply to this comment | 8 November 2005, 15:54 GMT |  |  
| 
 
| Re: September/October 2005 Newsletter |  
| Sebastian Schmied   |  
| 
haha...Michael seems to be a bit resentful :)
 |  
| Reply to this comment | 8 November 2005, 17:11 GMT |  |  
| 
 
| Re: September/October 2005 Newsletter |  
| James abba shalaka Rubingh   (Web Page)
 |  
| 
Interesting trivia factoid. I met this guy in Japan named Dr. Adler, who happens to be the main NASA guy in charge of the current Mars Rover mission. Back in the day, he authored a compression scheme known as "zip" ;)That is all, continue doing what you were doing.
 |  
| Reply to this comment | 8 November 2005, 17:53 GMT |  |  
| 
 
| Re: September/October 2005 Newsletter |  
| anykey   (Web Page)
 |  
| 
You people are lazy!Why, if I was in charge of the newsletter...
 *blahblahblah*
 Okay, I'm just as lazy, if not even lazier.
 |  
| Reply to this comment | 10 November 2005, 00:56 GMT |  |  
 |