Command Post Plus Released
Posted by Michael on 29 December 2003, 16:38 GMT
Greg Dietsche of Detached Solutions has released an update to his original 89/92+/V200 app, Command Post. Command Post Plus is designed to assist developers with creating bug-free applications for the 68k calculators. On top of the original features such as leak watching and the hex editor, there is a link port logger, disassembler, crash detection system, TI-BASIC extensions, and more. This app is clearly not intended for the average user but rather the advanced programmer, so be careful before hex editing your memory.
|
|
|
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: Command Post Plus Released
|
ti_is_good_++
|
The link port log and disassembly functions will come in handy, certainly.
|
|
29 December 2003, 22:28 GMT
|
|
Re: Command Post Plus Released
|
angelboy
(Web Page)
|
Hmm, has the crash protection been updated at all? I've tried to use it in the past (and still do), but I usually rely on kernO to keep the calculator from crashing. Anyway, this is a very nice app. Good job!!
|
|
30 December 2003, 23:39 GMT
|
|
Re: Command Post Plus Released
|
Michael McElroy
(Web Page)
|
This is REALLY starting to get on my nerves. Every single post I made on this thread was deleted - even the ones that were completely on topic.
Am I the only one that remembers that, whenever a post was deleted, the staff used to leave a message behind stating that it violated the posting policies? Why doesn't this happen anymore? The only explanation I can think of is that I'm being censored because someone doesn't like what I'm saying. Well, guess what: that's not what the rules say you're supposed to do. Taking out your own little personal vendetta on me by deleting everything I say is childish and asinine.
|
|
31 December 2003, 14:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
You're posting **** here...
|
Lionel Debroux
(Web Page)
|
Well, if I was an admin/moderator, I'd remove/modify your post, Lord NightRose... You can read again the guidelines to see you're violating several of those (yes, I know, my post is not very constructive either).
An admin/moderator can dislike someone with good reasons, but not moderate or ban every single post coming from the persons he/she doesn't like, if the post is not perfectly in the guidelines (if that was always like that, many boards would have less obstacles).
Being moderated often is not a proof per se that an admin/moderator is unfair (it can be, and often is, the poster who posts incorrect things). A admin/moderator who moderates unfairly or stupidly does not really deserve his/her powers (that's why I dropped admin powers on my board, I moderated in a stupid way twice in several days).
|
|
31 December 2003, 18:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Command Post Plus Released
|
Michael Vincent
(Web Page)
|
1. I do not delete all of your posts, only the ones that violate the guidelines. This one I'm replying to does. If you have a problem, then e-mail me. Never have you ever actually contacted me to ask why I'm deleting so many of your posts.
Instead, you just complain here so you can incite people to your perceived injustices. Here, do a google search for: "michael mcelroy" site:ticalc.org
I see 10 pages worth of news items that your posts are on, and that's not even including the ones before you changed your shown name from lord_nightrose.
2. It seems you are bent on attacking me. I refer viewers to the URL for this post. Now *who* is childish and asinine? Would you care to explain why you felt it necessary to download a copy of my staff photo and do that? I'm waiting...
3. That "[This message has..." was to block posts without deleting the ones underneath. It is used when there is legitimate discussion that should be kept underneath an off-topic post. This hasn't been occuring recently, so it hasn't been used.
Last, I would like to reiterate: If you do not like the policies here, which the staff has enforced for a long time (You have no idea how much moderation Nick D. did), then LEAVE. You aren't obligated in life to post on this site. Either shut up, or leave. I'm sorry that I have to be so blunt about it, but you are the one with the problem.
|
|
31 December 2003, 19:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Command Post Plus Released
|
Michael McElroy
(Web Page)
|
> 1. I do not delete all of your posts, only the ones that violate the guidelines.
Then why, in a thread about beta testing, did you delete every comment I made about how to become a Sony beta tester?
> 2. It seems you are bent on attacking me.
Well, you're in charge of the news boards, and as far as any of us know, you're the only one who deletes things.
As for the photograph - that's called "a joke". Besides, I downloaded that picture long before you were a staff member.
> 3. That "[This message has..." was to block posts without deleting the ones underneath. It is used when there is legitimate discussion that should be kept underneath an off-topic post. This hasn't been occuring recently, so it hasn't been used.
That is absolutely untrue. The entire thread following my comments about Sony beta testing was deleted.
> If you do not like the policies here, which the staff has enforced for a long time (You have no idea how much moderation Nick D. did), then LEAVE.
I *do* know how much moderation Nick D. did, and I noticed that he didn't pick on a specific person. Like you have been. Believe me, I have been keeping track of what comments have been deleted (through Google's cached copies of pages and whatnot), and for the past couple weeks, the ratio of my posts that were deleted, as compared to everyone else, was at least three to one.
You even deleted my on-topic post talking about how I had used Command Post in some of my programs. I'd really like an explanation for that one, seeing how it was on-topic, non-offensive, non-disruptive, etc.
> I'm sorry that I have to be so blunt about it, but you are the one with the problem.
Sorry, Mike, but when I come back here only a few hours after posting something on-topic, only to find that it has been deleted, the problem is obviously not on my end.
|
|
31 December 2003, 21:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Command Post Plus Released
|
Morgan Davies
(Web Page)
|
>> Don't insult or flame other people in your comments. Keep such sentiments to private email, or better yet, avoid them completely.
>> Please be constructive and keep comment topics relevant to the article you are replying to.
>> Don't post asking why a comment was deleted; we deleted it because we felt it was in violation of these guidelines. If you need more of an explanation, please Contact Us.
>> Messages containing "first comment" boasts, requests for game ports, or criticisms of "newsworthiness" will generally be deleted.
==
These appear every time you click to reply to a post. Note the one that says to contact us if you need an explanation. I WILL ALWAYS REPLY TO AN E-MAIL, regardless!
I and every single staff member at ticalc.org would agree that we treat every community member with equality. Obviously you and Micahel seem to have a problem with each other, but I know that he would not purposefully remove all your posts just because you were the individual posting them. The staff would not allow such behavior.
I have said this before...MICHAEL IS NOT THE ONLY ONE WHO DELETES POSTS. Just because he is the News Editor does not mean that he is the only individual to reove them.
Alos regarding the discussion about the posts text being removed instead of deleted, this is generally the guideline to determine which option is used for that.
1. If a post violated the guidelines but has relevant infoprmation to the topic in some pf it's daughter posts then the text of the one post will be removed leaving the other posts in tact.
2. If a post violates the guidelines and all of it's daughter posts do as well, the post will be deleted and thus it's daughter posts will be as well.
|
|
31 December 2003, 21:01 GMT
|
|
1 2
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|