New York Times Article
Posted by Andy on 2 September 1999, 21:20 GMT
The New York Times ran an article today about the effects of graphing calculators on education. The reporter contacted staff member Kirk Meyer a few months back about his take on the issue, which was not directly voiced in the article. However, several top quality programs that he pointed out are listed as well as a reference to our site. The article is available to be read online.
|
|
|
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: New York Times Article
|
ajorians
|
Ticalc.org seems to be in more and more newspapers.
|
|
2 September 1999, 21:55 GMT
|
|
Re: New York Times Article
|
ajorians
|
I think there are a lot more games than mentioned, Right? I didn't know "kids" craked the assembly code on the calculators. Where was I? When was this?
|
|
2 September 1999, 22:02 GMT
|
|
Re: New York Times Article
|
ComputerWiz
(Web Page)
|
I dont think the kids who are making toes sat programs are gonna make any money what do you guys think?
|
|
2 September 1999, 23:17 GMT
|
|
Re: New York Times Article
|
ToddEStan
|
Did I read that right? $35 for a set of programs for the 83 that help on the SAT? I wonder what's so great there that isn't available free here? No wonder he hasn't had many takers.
Todd
|
|
2 September 1999, 23:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: New York Times Article
|
Sam Heald
(Web Page)
|
Look at their original statement:
The brothers are charging $35 for the programs and guarantee that a student's score will rise by 160 points or more.
Now:
The brothers charge only $25 dollars for "their" programs. Their guarantee has also dropped 70 points (now at 90).
Now look at their fine print:
Score Raising Programs Incorporated does not warrant the accuracy, or completeness of the information, text, links, and other items contained on this server or any other server.
*This guarantee ensures that if your score is below a 600, and does not raise 90 points, SRP will give you tutorial lessons on how to use the programs better at no cost.
Great, so in the event that "their" junk doesn't work, they'll give you a free lesson just in time to receive a letter from college saying "Sorry, we can not accept you." Credibility? I think not. Did they actually write the programs or did they pirate them? Who knows, but I am definitely not paying $25 to find out.
|
|
3 September 1999, 00:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: New York Times Article
|
jeepfuncj7
|
I have to agree. I was going to email those two and tell them how pathetic they really are. I still may. I wrote several programs in high school to help with certain classes and AP tests. My AP Physics and AP Calculus programs are here on this site. I distributed these programs free of charge to anybody that wanted them, not just my friends or people in my AP classes, but anyone who asked me. I was even offered money for my work by several students after they took the tests and found how much my programs helped them with the equations. I never took any. These programs helped me too, and that's the reason I wrote them, not for money. Although, if a friend wants a program written and they ask me to do it, I do it for free even if I can't use it for anything.
Oh yeah, btw, I didn't practice at all for my SAT tests. I took it in 10th and 11th grades and my math score went up 40 points. Gee, I wonder why? Maybe cause I learned more in an extra year of math? I used a scientific both times too because my classmates bugged me for days before the test about how I was going to cheat by using a program to get all the answers.
And a guarantee that your scores will increase because of their program? They should be in the Enquirer, not the Times.
|
|
5 September 1999, 05:23 GMT
|
|
1 2
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|