Re: TI-H:Dead list

Re: TI-H:Dead list

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H:Dead list
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 17:25:17 -0900
• In-Reply-To: <4.1.20000302074035.0095caf0@bigred.unl.edu>
• References: <v04020a00b4e39e8bad5b@[24.237.14.142]> <003601bf83d2$6f96fc40$564b93cd@johnathanyu> <4.3.0.20000301160959.00c34180@mail.netzero.net>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>At 07:29 PM 3/1/00 -0900, you wrote:
>>
>>>have you al noticed that after all these "dead list" messages there tends to
>>>be a spur of messages trying to revive it?  it's kinda like a defibulator
>>>try to restart a person's heart  hehe.  oh that brings up a question exactly
>>>how much eletricity goes through one of those anyways?  just a thought.  now
>>>a real hardware question (i think)...
>>>
>>>   what are the exact specs for the Intel Willamette wor the new Athlon?
>>>hey it's hardware right and ti and intel do have a partnership going on...
>>
>>Anything related to Intel or Microsoft is gay.
>
>Well I suppose thats one way to jump start the lists start a holy war :)

Too bad no war will start, everyone knows the trueth.  :)

• Re: TI-H:Dead list
• From: "Bernard" <npfs@cybcon.com>

• Re: TI-H:Dead list
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Re: TI-H:Dead list
• From: "Bernard" <npfs@cybcon.com>
• Re: TI-H:Dead list
• From: Rob Smith <Kormoc@netzero.net>
• Re: TI-H:Dead list
• From: Adam Kavan <akavan@cse.unl.edu>

• Prev: Re: TI-H:Dead list
• Next: Re: TI-H:Dead list
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread