Re: TI-H:Dead list

Re: TI-H:Dead list

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H:Dead list
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 19:29:13 -0900
• In-Reply-To: <003601bf83d2$6f96fc40$564b93cd@johnathanyu>
• References: <4.3.0.20000301160959.00c34180@mail.netzero.net>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>have you al noticed that after all these "dead list" messages there tends to
>be a spur of messages trying to revive it?  it's kinda like a defibulator
>try to restart a person's heart  hehe.  oh that brings up a question exactly
>how much eletricity goes through one of those anyways?  just a thought.  now
>a real hardware question (i think)...
>
>   what are the exact specs for the Intel Willamette wor the new Athlon?
>hey it's hardware right and ti and intel do have a partnership going on...

Anything related to Intel or Microsoft is gay.

• Re: TI-H:Dead list
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
• Re: TI-H:Dead list
• From: Adam Kavan <akavan@cse.unl.edu>

• Re: TI-H:Dead list
• From: Rob Smith <Kormoc@netzero.net>
• Re: TI-H:Dead list
• From: "Bernard" <npfs@cybcon.com>

• Prev: Re: TI-H:Dead list
• Next: Re: TI-H:Dead list
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread