Re: TI-H: Dead?

To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: TI-H: Dead?
From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 07:23:04 -0600
References: <6.1248cca.25b7c542@aol.com> <000e01bf62ff$002572e0$2c8ffacf@kaus> <031701bf6367$98df1000$0100007f@rdtech.com> <006101bf63c7$0b160f20$944afacf@kaus> <002501bf63cc$e8a6ffc0$d18d1c18@rr.com> <388EE293.C48C1AC2@mailandnews.com>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Explain to us good folks, how does Coca-Cola have a monopoly?

Bryan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Giles Pollock" <glp71s@mailandnews.com>
To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 6:03 AM
Subject: Re: TI-H: Dead?


> 
> As the list is decidedly dead, how about an OT... has anyone noticed the
> monopoly Coca-Cola has? more of a monopoly than bill gates too...
> 
> 
> please dont even think of flaming me for this, its been days since the last
> post anyway
> 
> 
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: TI-H: Dead?

From: Giles Pollock <glp71s@mailandnews.com>

References:

Re: TI-H: Dead?

From: BFHSNO@aol.com

Re: TI-H: Dead?

From: "Kaus" <kaus@cybrzn.com>

Re: TI-H: Dead?

From: "David Knaack" <dknaack@rdtech.com>

Re: TI-H: Dead?

From: "Kaus" <kaus@cybrzn.com>

Re: TI-H: Dead?

From: "David Knaack" <dknaack@rdtech.com>

Re: TI-H: Dead?

From: Giles Pollock <glp71s@mailandnews.com>

Prev: Re: TI-H: Dead?
Next: Re: TI-H: Dead?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread