Re: TI-H: TI Modem

Re: TI-H: TI Modem

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: TI Modem
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 14:51:16 -0800
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• In-Reply-To: <374A4F87.959DEC3A@geneva.edu>
• References: <19990522175757.70624.qmail@hotmail.com> <v04020a05b36d419b3944@[24.237.1.119]> <v04020a03b36e1d19e5a7@[24.237.1.119]> <v04020a00b36e8c730cfc@[24.237.1.119]> <v04020a01b36f860523b1@[24.237.1.119]>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>Let's stop here and start over.  Even through much miscommunication, I
>think it is
>clear that 1.7MB per second or 7.5MB per second whichever it may be is
>considerably
>faster than 5KB per second, would you not agree?

Sure its faster.  Infact, many cisco routers used the 68000 in their designs.

I've got a TCP/IP stack written completely for the 68000 with a 3-Com
ethernet hacked to it.  Anyone interested in getting the file?

>Um..  A 68000 uses 4 clock cycles per bus cycle.  Another embedded thing?

Must be a combo of old and new stuff.  I have a mid 1995 databook.  Maybe I
read the thing wrong.

• Re: TI-H: TI Modem
• From: Calan <clambert@geneva.edu>

• Re: TI-H: TI Modem
• From: "J D" <starkruzr@hotmail.com>
• Re: TI-H: TI Modem
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Re: TI-H: TI Modem
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Re: TI-H: TI Modem
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Re: TI-H: TI Modem
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Re: TI-H: TI Modem
• From: Calan <clambert@geneva.edu>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: TI Modem
• Next: Re: TI-H: question
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread