Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:52:04 -0800
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <v04205505b3a02bd23f44@[38.29.61.11]>
References: <19990630191324.34802.qmail@hotmail.com> <19990630191324.34802.qmail@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


>What in the world are you talking about? MacOS X server has been
>proven to beat NT on copying over TCP/IP (Even MacOS 8.6 does that)
>and has been proven great in the long run. It has already been
>updated to fix those CGI errors and is open-source, so if you don't
>like something FIX IT YOURSELF! Second of all, Macs will not use a
>Workstation version of MacOS X, they will use MacOS X Client.
>Microsoft was stupid for calling it NT Workstation because it NEVER
>works.
>
>All G3s can run the MacOS X server, and all 604e's can run MacOS X
>client (if Apple sticks with their promise, which they probably will.
>They always have before when it comes to supported hardware.)

The iMac can run OSX, but apple won't support it.

>Apple has an INCORPORATED image, and it looks very good. An stop
>referring to Mac or Macintosh as a company, they are products. We
>don't go around calling Microsoft Corp. Windows, now do we?

We?  Where is mommy.  :(

References:

Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

From: J D <starkruzr@hotmail.com>

Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

From: Rosyna <rosyna@earthlink.net>