Re: Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?
From: Kaus <kaus@cybrzn.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 10:08:24 -0600
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.02.9901050459310.32161-100000@ticalc.org>
References: <fc.000f62d10014bdb03b9aca0078213d8d.14bdb3@pinecrest.edu>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


you could think of it that way, but to be consisntent, you would say:
 2nd more alpha 6

At 04:59 AM 1/5/99 +0100, you wrote:
>
>No, its really 2nd-more-alpha-S :)
>
>-- 
>Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>   File Archives, News, Features, and HTML
>   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
>
>On Mon, 4 Jan 1999, David Norelid wrote:
>
>> 
>> no, its 2nd mode, aplha S. my bad
>> 
>> 
>> FUZZ
>> David Norelid
>> Fuzz Enterprises Inc.
>> -------------------
>> listen.to/yankovic
>> 
>
>

References:

Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?

From: fuzz@pinecrest.edu (David Norelid)

Re: Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?

From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>

Prev: Re: Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?
Next: Re(2): Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread