Re: Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?

Re: Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?
• From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
• Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 04:59:41 +0100 (MET)
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <fc.000f62d10014bdb03b9aca0078213d8d.14bdb3@pinecrest.edu>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

No, its really 2nd-more-alpha-S :)

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, and HTML
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Mon, 4 Jan 1999, David Norelid wrote:

> 
> no, its 2nd mode, aplha S. my bad
> 
> 
> FUZZ
> David Norelid
> Fuzz Enterprises Inc.
> -------------------
> listen.to/yankovic
> 

• Re: Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?
• From: Kaus <kaus@cybrzn.com>

• Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?
• From: fuzz@pinecrest.edu (David Norelid)

• Prev: Re: TI-H: Rom version?
• Next: Re: Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread