Re: TI-H: Re: y2k[increasingly off topic]

Re: TI-H: Re: y2k[increasingly off topic]

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: Re: y2k[increasingly off topic]
• From: Shaun McCormick <smmcc@home.com>
• Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 15:15:28 -0600
• References: <0.5762dbcd.259d1e27@aol.com> <00a501bf536b$70f25900$d18d1c18@rr.com> <386BCBD9.3EBD892B@home.net>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

It's actually the penny above.
Ex: $1.29 9/10 == $1.30
They do that to attract customers.
Hell, $1.29 looks better than $1.30, eh?

Paul Kafasis wrote:

> To get even farther off topic, does anyone know how gas stations manage
> to get away with charging x.xx and 9/10's of a cent? This seems like
> fairly false advertising to me, or at least a very odd practice. Do they
> round up, down, or just charge 1.22 a gallon when the sign reads 1.21
> 9/10? Anyone have a clue?
>
> -P

• Re: TI-H: Re: y2k[increasingly off topic]
• From: RoniBarrett@aol.com
• Re: TI-H: Re: y2k[increasingly off topic]
• From: "David Knaack" <dknaack@rdtech.com>
• Re: TI-H: Re: y2k[increasingly off topic]
• From: Paul Kafasis <punkrock17@home.net>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: Re: y2k[increasingly off topic]
• Next: Re: TI-H: Re: y2k[increasingly off topic]
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread