Re: TI-H: [OT] Un-TI-Hardware@somegenerousperson.net

Re: TI-H: [OT] Un-TI-Hardware@somegenerousperson.net

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: [OT] Un-TI-Hardware@somegenerousperson.net
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 23:38:06 -0800 (AKDT)
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.96.980911185402.18760E-100000@usr01.primenet.com>
• References: <l03130300b21f13c4673a@[192.168.1.66]>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>Now THAT is an interesting statement.  Especially since NT 5 will not
>support plaforms other than Alpha and ia32/64 (Intel).  PPC support was
>dropped as of NT4.

Not completely dropped...  :/

>Correction: they were written for a UNIX varient first.  You seem to have
>troubles making the distiction between Linux and UNIX.
>
>Most games for the game consoles in general (including those for NES,
>SNES, NES64, etc) were written on SGI Indy's, Indigo's and Octane's
>running IRIX (SGI's UNIX-based atrocity).

Ummm...  No.  I mean linux.  some were unix.

-The FIRST public domain portable hardware mp3 player-
http://gussie.alaska.net

• Re: TI-H: [OT] Un-TI-Hardware@somegenerousperson.net
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: [OT] Un-TI-Hardware@somegenerousperson.net
• From: Adam Fritzler <afritz@iname.com>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: [OT] Un-TI-Hardware@somegenerousperson.net
• Next: Re: TI-H: [OT] Un-TI-Hardware@somegenerousperson.net
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread