Re: TI-H: Re: Speedy Calc...

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Re: Speedy Calc...
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 21:17:44 -0900
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <912229435.13118.528@excite.com>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Remember, you have to divide the clock of a CISC processor by 3 to get is
BOGOs.  The PPC is a RISC, so you divide it by 1.

Grant


>Well I think Intel's page says the same thing, except I think IBM switched
>"Intel" with their name on the bar graph of performance... It all really
>doesn't matter since chips are just getting faster every second.  If it has
>a good deal of flip flop backside cache, it has a fast clock, and it is
>designed well, then it is good enough for me.
>
>
>On Fri, 27 Nov 1998 20:55:50 -0900, Grant Stockly wrote:
>
>>
>> >My God... you are the average Mac user aren't you? ATI, IBM... yuch...
>> >anything but IBM... please anything but IBM!!!
>>
>> IBM's processors are hands down faster tha intel.
>>
>> Go look at their page with statistics...
>>
>> http://www.chips.ibm.com/products/ppc/overview/perform.html
>
>-dan
>
>You standing in line?
>You believing the lies?
>You bowing down to this flag?
>You've Got a Bullet in Your Head.
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________
>Get your free, private e-mail at http://mail.excite.com/

References:

Re: TI-H: Re: Speedy Calc...

From: "Dan" <danb@excite.com>