Re: TI-H: Re: Speedy Calc...

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Re: Speedy Calc...
From: "Dan" <danb@excite.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 21:03:55 PST
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

Well I think Intel's page says the same thing, except I think IBM switched
"Intel" with their name on the bar graph of performance... It all really
doesn't matter since chips are just getting faster every second.  If it has
a good deal of flip flop backside cache, it has a fast clock, and it is
designed well, then it is good enough for me.

On Fri, 27 Nov 1998 20:55:50 -0900, Grant Stockly wrote:

> 
> >My God... you are the average Mac user aren't you? ATI, IBM... yuch...
> >anything but IBM... please anything but IBM!!!
> 
> IBM's processors are hands down faster tha intel.
> 
> Go look at their page with statistics...
> 
> http://www.chips.ibm.com/products/ppc/overview/perform.html

-dan

You standing in line?
You believing the lies?
You bowing down to this flag?
You've Got a Bullet in Your Head.

_______________________________________________________
Get your free, private e-mail at http://mail.excite.com/

Follow-Ups:

Re: TI-H: Re: Speedy Calc...

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>