Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)

To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)
From: "Jon Olson" <morph@jmss.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 16:51:34 -0500
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Because even if the file is fragmented, you'll still be able to keep up with
the speed needed to stream mp3s. Therefore, there's really no need to defrag
the drive, unless you get a lot of extreemely small free blocks, which is
possible, but won't happen for a long time (and an occassional
back-up/restore defrag won't kill you), you don't have to worry about the
drive being fragmented.

-- Jon Olson

-----Original Message-----
From: David Knaack <dknaack@hotmail.com>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Thursday, November 05, 1998 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)


>
>>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>>DEFRAG isn't required for transfering 30k per sec.
>
>Why does the transfer rate have anything to do with
>the requirment for defragmentation?
>
>DK
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>

Prev: Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)
Next: Re: Toll Booth and junk (was Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/In...)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread