Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications
>I'm just taking what the nice pretty data sheets told me :> all i know is it
>has a nastily small instruction set which i looked at and thought avoiding
>would be my best option. (technicaly it is a "reduced instruction set" :)
Yes, but think about the time per instruction. :) Every clock cycle on
the AVR is an instruction cycle. Every 4 clock cycles on the PIC is one
instruction cycle. A 1MHz AVR is 4x faster than a 1MHz PIC. :)
>>I do more than AVR stuff, but there are other people doing calc programming
>>so I don't bother... Everything I want for my calculator has already been
>>made.
>Oh, now that can't possibly be true...what about a driver for a to-be-built
>realtime hologram rending system that's powered by your wearable computer at
>heart, as well as some covert piece of military technology :>
Oh yeah... I forgot about that. :) I'll get started right now. :)
I realy don't like software. I like making an AVR do something and having
it isolated from everything else. :)
Of course, a traffic thingie made on an AVR would look dirty. :)
I got carried away a few weeks ago and connected an ISA video card to an
8515... I had to stop myself. :) After making the keyboard driver afew
months before, pretty soon the AVR would be a computer. :)
Grant
References: