Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: Re(fcc): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 00:43:18 -0900
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <19981031232345.11676.qmail@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


>First, I don't see why broadcasting TI-calc signals on corporate radio
>bands has anything to do with linking (~5MHz is fine) and second I doubt
>the FCC will care that there are 5MHz calculator noises being broadcast
>within a small range (unless you plan to play Two-Player Tetris with
>Grant, from Florida, but in that case if you are still shallow to be
>playing Tetris, on a calculator, then you could come up with a
>TI-internet protocol)...


Awww...  That 600ms net lag.  ;)

Anything under 50mw should be fine in every country of the world.  If you
are within cuba, you can have an unlicensed station.  :)

And the FCC is realy going to go after me for starting a 5,000watt station
in Barrow, AK.

If ANYONE knows what barrow is like...you will know why they wouldn't care.  :)

The sun is out for 6 months, and away for 6 months.  :)  Its like one huge
day...


And in the winter, its hard to start your car in 75 below weather.  :)

References:

From:

Prev: Re: Re(2): TI-H: Radio/Infrared/Laser Communications
Next: Re: TI-H: Really G?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread