Re: TI-H: 92/89
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: 92/89
the 92+ has built in ASM supportm so you don't need to waste any extra
ram on a shell!
i doubt they will evey update the os to include geometry just becase
then no one would have a reason to but a 92 except for bigger lcd and
better keys.
the spin interface will probably have to be different as well, but i am
not sure, because i am no ti HW guru, just because it uses a different
processor. (donno if that is correct or not)
Christopher Kalos wrote:
>
> OR, the 89 users will rub it in the 92 users faces that they don't need to waste any extra RAM on a shell like Fargo, update the OS to include geometry and conversion constants, and then pop in a SP Interface and toss the 92 users a nickel. Since the 89 has built in ASM support as well as being in an acceptable package, it's hitting the HP48 edge (although still light years behind)
Follow-Ups:
References: