Re: TI-H: MP3s
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: MP3s
Look, I'm talking about maximizing storage space, I know that a 7MHz z80
couldn't do realtime decoding. Next, just to get technical, a 100MHz pentium
can do the decoding in the background. It's called using a real OS (read:
Linux)
CK
Song of the minute: U2- Sunday Bloody Sunday
Grant Stockly wrote:
> I made an MP3 player... I know this kind of stuff... :) I'm not crazy!
> The calc controlls the MP3 player which is NOT on the calc... If it takes
> a 166MHz pent or a 80MHz mac to play mp3s, I'd like to see the codeing for
> a 7MHz z80... :)
>
> >Okay, here we go again... First off, if you want to use all of this
> >through the calc, do the world a favor. Encode at half-bandwidth (64K),
> >and they become smaller.
> >Not to mention, not everyone's a total audiophile, most ppl never
> >notice. I prefer the 128's myself, but 64 is acceptable, and still
> >better than Real Audio.
> >CK
> >Song of the minute: Smashing Pumpkins- Disarm (and yes, this IS my mp3
> >collection, whatever's playing when I'm typing)
> >
> >Grant Stockly wrote:
> >
> >> >From: David Norelid <fuzz@pinecrest.edu>
> >> >>>>>dont most people [collect mp3's]?
> >> >>>>Not me, no use for 'em.
> >> >>>>DK
> >> >>>Right, and my name isn't Fuzz
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Seriously, I have a nice stereo and CD player at my house,
> >> >in my car and at work. I rarely go anywhere else that I would
> >> >need music.
> >> >
> >> >Besides, I usually listen to NPR instead of music.
> >> >DK
> >> It isn't the music, but the quality...
> >>
> >> 4 minute CD track:
> >> *~55MB in CD format
> >> *~4.5MB in MP3 format
> >>
> >> and most of all, you can hardly reliaze any decrease in quality!
References: