Re: TI-H: MP3s
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: MP3s
I made an MP3 player... I know this kind of stuff... :) I'm not crazy!
The calc controlls the MP3 player which is NOT on the calc... If it takes
a 166MHz pent or a 80MHz mac to play mp3s, I'd like to see the codeing for
a 7MHz z80... :)
>Okay, here we go again... First off, if you want to use all of this
>through the calc, do the world a favor. Encode at half-bandwidth (64K),
>and they become smaller.
>Not to mention, not everyone's a total audiophile, most ppl never
>notice. I prefer the 128's myself, but 64 is acceptable, and still
>better than Real Audio.
>CK
>Song of the minute: Smashing Pumpkins- Disarm (and yes, this IS my mp3
>collection, whatever's playing when I'm typing)
>
>Grant Stockly wrote:
>
>> >From: David Norelid <fuzz@pinecrest.edu>
>> >>>>>dont most people [collect mp3's]?
>> >>>>Not me, no use for 'em.
>> >>>>DK
>> >>>Right, and my name isn't Fuzz
>> >
>> >
>> >Seriously, I have a nice stereo and CD player at my house,
>> >in my car and at work. I rarely go anywhere else that I would
>> >need music.
>> >
>> >Besides, I usually listen to NPR instead of music.
>> >DK
>> It isn't the music, but the quality...
>>
>> 4 minute CD track:
>> *~55MB in CD format
>> *~4.5MB in MP3 format
>>
>> and most of all, you can hardly reliaze any decrease in quality!
Follow-Ups: