Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited

Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 09:19:36 -0800 (AKDT)
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <35afa81c.358105@pilot.msu.edu>
• References: <l0313030bb1d3fa9ef164@[192.168.1.66]> <l03130304b1d3f45f7999@[192.168.1.66]> <l03130304b1d3f45f7999@[192.168.1.66]> <l0313030bb1d3fa9ef164@[192.168.1.66]>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>>>You only need 2 frequencies, and they aren't that broad-spectrum.  The
>>>one I have has about a 0.3 MHz spectrum coverage in the band, e.g. it
>>>takes up from 99.1 to 99.4 on the FM dial.
>>
>>The one you have is different than mine so I guess I'm wrong...  ;)
>>
>>You only need two frequency's, but it would operate faster with 4...
>
>Uhh no, you ONLY need 2.  What the heck do you need four frequencies
>for?  For each calc there's one transmitter, one receiver.  If you use
>four, you're thinking of transmitting and receiving for EACH linkport
>wire = dumb and bad :).

Thats what you'd need to do it without too many components...

• Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited
• From: Bryan Rittmeyer <bryanr@flash.net>

• Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited
• From: tsaimelv@pilot.msu.edu (Mel Tsai)

• Prev: Re: TI-H: An addon idea.
• Next: Re: TI-H: Another memory expander idea.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread