Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited

Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 19:29:55 -0800 (AKDT)
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <35b4e308.4561810@pilot.msu.edu>
• References: <l03130304b1d3f45f7999@[192.168.1.66]> <l03130304b1d3f45f7999@[192.168.1.66]>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>You only need 2 frequencies, and they aren't that broad-spectrum.  The
>one I have has about a 0.3 MHz spectrum coverage in the band, e.g. it
>takes up from 99.1 to 99.4 on the FM dial.

The one you have is different than mine so I guess I'm wrong...  ;)

You only need two frequency's, but it would operate faster with 4...

>>You'd have to get 4 different freqs.  The ones I've seen just transmit on a
>>broad spectrum so any blank freq will pick it up.
>>
>>>In the new surplus catalog, there is a device designed to take the sound
>>>output of the headphone jack of a portable CD player and make it FM so
>>>that it can be picked up on your car radio.  (I think It's $15-) It seems
>>>like 1/2 of the link transmitter/reciever.  all we need is a FM decoder
>>>to have working link hardware =)
>>>Larry C
>
>
>-Mel

• Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited
• From: tsaimelv@pilot.msu.edu (Mel Tsai)

• Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited
• From: tsaimelv@pilot.msu.edu (Mel Tsai)

• Prev: TI-H: Making this list better.
• Next: TI-H: Joystick
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread