Re: TI-H: Power PC
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Power PC
it dosent matter to me, on my PC I use both EIDE controlers on the motherboard,the
floppy control, and a SCSI a seperate controler.
best of both worlds
I was just trying to say that EIDE can come close.
joe
Grant Stockly wrote:
> yeah right. UltraDMA runs at 33mbits MAX. I can get a constant 40MBit and
> 80MBit burst with Ultra Wide SCSI... Of course, it matters on the
> platform... ;)
>
> >UDMA is about as fast(or faster) then SCSI
> >
> >joe
> >
> >Adam Johnson wrote:
> >
> >> Oh, NO! A Mac PC war. Here's my 2 cents....
> >>
> >> Each bring it a specific 'better' portion to the table. Macs have
> >>built-in
> >> SCSI and it has allways been that way. They realised that SCSI was better,
> >> faster, but harder to use, and decided speed benefits outweighed the
> >>diffaculty.
> >> IBM's on the other hand, wanted simplistic hardware so anyone, pretty much,
> >> could get inside their computer and fiddle with it. That is why DOS was
> >>so hard
> >> to use. You can't have hardware and software simple at the same time, the
> >> computer will melt down, and the software will crash a lot. (Hence, Win95/98
> >> making its interface more simple, causes it to crash a lot. ; ) )
> >>Anyway, the
> >> main idea is:
> >>
> >> Mac: Easy to use SOFTWARE, pain in the butt HARDWARE.
> >> IBM: Pain in the ass SOFTWARE, easy (For MOST people) to change HARDWARE.
> >>
> >> (NOTE: Sometimes, the hardware wasn't very easy, this was because people are
> >> stupid. It really is simple, they used Mac software, and thought, 'Hey!
> >>If our
> >> hardware was like THIS, we could take over the world!' Obivously they were
> >> wrong. What really happens is, it creates a confilict, which the average NEW
> >> user is too stupid to fix, so they call an advanced users. Pay them lots of
> >> money, and they fix it, while telling the other person what they just did.
> >> (which the other person has no clue what they said.) )
> >>
> >> Adam
Follow-Ups:
References: